Stanford Study - Organic Vs. Non-Organic

Here is the original Study http://altadena.patch.com/articles/organic-food-study-health

Click here to SUBSCRIBE: http://bit.ly/2fw7xYU

Powered by Organifi... Because YOU are Enough!

Check out our Amazing Superfoods: https://bit.ly/2JAan8p

Follow us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Organifi/
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/organifi/
Pinterest: https://www.pinterest.com/juicing/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/organifi

Check out our blogs: http://fitlife.tv/
https://www.organifishop.com/blogs/news

Join the Organifi Tribe: https://www.organifishop.com/pages/join-our-tribe

Get my free Alpha Reset Guide Here: http://www.organifi.com/ytalpha/

The Stanford study published earlier this month—entitled Are Organic Foods Safer or Healthier Than Conventional Alternatives?: A Systematic Review—confronted the common misconception that organic foods are more nutritious.

Thanks for clearing that up, scientists! For years I"ve been going around thinking that by simply omitting some toxic chemicals, farmers were creating superfoods chock full of nutrients and vitamins lacking in their watery and flavorless counterparts.

The fact is, I don"t know anyone who was ever under the impression that they were getting more vitamin bang for their bucks, other than perhaps the researchers who conducted the much discussed study.

A close friend of mine buys only organic and no, she"s not some rich rock star, prima donna living life on high in the Hollywood hills. A full-time mom of an autistic 4-year-old who suffers from a host of food allergies, she subsists on a single income earned by her husband.

For her, the revelation of the study is no revelation at all, because by picking premium produce, she believes that she is limiting her son"s exposure to the kinds of environmental factors that may have contributed to some of his conditions in the first place, many of which require expensive medicines and treatments.

source